WebQuest on

The Wet Rice Green Revolution
 

Introduction

Task

Procedure

Resources

Evaluation

Conclusion

EVALUATION

Your WebQuest will be evaluated both for the final product and for the process that you go through. You will assess the process within your group through peer evaluation and your teacher will evaluate your product.

Process Evaluation

Focus of Evaluation

Beginning (0 - 2 m)

Developing (3 – 5 m)

Accomplished (6 - 8 m)

Exemplary (9 - 10 m)

Score

Contribution

(10 m)

 

 

Does not research, gather & share any relevant information 

 

Research, gather & share very little relevant information

 

Research, gather & share some relevant  information

 

Research,  gather & share a great deal of relevant information

 

Cooperation

(10 m)

 

Usually argues with teammates & is unhelpful

 

Sometimes argues with teammates & offers help when asked

Rarely argues with teammates & is mostly helpful  

Never argues with teammates & is always helpful

 

Take responsibility

(10 m)

 

 

 

 

Does not perform any duties of the assigned team role

Performs very few duties

Performs nearly all the duties

Performs all the duties of the assigned team role

 

Value others’ viewpoints

(10 m)

 

Is always talking – never allows anyone to speak

Usually does most of the talking – rarely allows others to speak

 

Listens, but sometimes talks too much

Listens and speaks a fair amount

 

Attitude

(10 m)

 

 

Constantly complains & gives a lot of excuses

Generally positive but tends to complain

Positive

Very positive

 

 

Product Evaluation 

Focus of Evaluation

Beginning
(0 - 2 m)

Developing
(3 – 5 m)

Accomplished
(6 - 8 m)

Exemplary
(9 - 10 m)

Score

Accuracy

(10 m)

 

Barely accurate

 

Partially  accurate

 

Mostly accurate 

Fully accurate

 

 

Relevance

(10 m)

 

Barely relevant

 

Partially  relevant

 

Mostly relevant

 

Fully relevant

 

 

 

Organisation

(10 m)

 

Disorganised

 

 

Somewhat  organised

 

Mostly organized

Effectlvely

organised

 

 

 

Coverage

(10 m)

Lack of  depth

 

Some depth

 

 

Reasonable depth

In-depth

 

 

 

Thinking

(10 m)

 

Overall lack of thinking

 

Satisfactory  thinking

 

Proficient thinking

 

Exceptional thinking

 

 

 

Use of illustrations & visual aids

(10 m)

Ineffective

Somewhat effective

Mostly effective

Totally effective

 

 

 
WQ