Russel Ward outlined his interpretation of the
Australian national character in his 1958 book, The Australian Legend.
METHOD
The Turner 'Frontier Thesis
Ward took F.J. Turner's 'Frontier Thesis' from American history and applied it
to
The Australian Frontier
Ward reversed this for
In The Australian Legend, Ward argued that 'scanty rainfall and great
distances ensured that most of the habitable land could be occupied only
sparsely and by pastoralists'.
The Society Created By
The pastoral properties, because of the dry climate and infertility of the
soil, were so large that there were few pastoral properties and therefore few
landowners.
However, the pastoralists, known as 'squatters', employed many hands, such as
stockmen to look after the sheep and cattle, and shearers to shear the wool
from the sheep. Ward contrasted this experience with that of the small American
farmers who were in large numbers on the American frontier:
The plain fact is that the typical Australian frontiersman in the last century was a wage-worker who did not, usually, expect to become anything else.... his economic interests, unlike those of the American frontiersman, reinforced this tendency towards a social, collectivist outlook. By loyal combination with his fellows he might win better conditions from his employer, but the possibility of becoming his own master by individual enterprise was usually but a remote dream.
Australian National Characteristics
Ward wrote that this type of society had produced what he saw as the national
values of
a. Mateship - a concern for the welfare of your
fellowman.
b. Egalitarianism.
c. Anti-Authoritarianism.
See a summary of the ABC 1992 video on Ward's thesis, Sydney or the Bush.
Assessing How the Bush Myth was Created and its impact on the collective memory
of Australians
On the 20th anniversary of the publication of The Australian Legend, the
academic history journal, Historicial Studies,
Three articles dealt with the Australian Legend or Bush myth.
(1)Russel Ward in his article "The Australian Legend Revisited", emphasised that he was not so much saying that the Bush myth was reality in the nineteenth century, but tracing how a myth or national ethos had been created in the nineteenth century.
(2)Graeme Davison in "Sydney or the Bush" described how city intellectual in the 1890s disillusioned with urban squalor, competitiveness, poverty, and class distinctions had created an imagined country side of idyllic, egalitarian, and healthy settings that was more a product of their imagination and dislike for their own urban environment than the realities of rural life. This theme was also taken up in the ABC 1992 video The City and the Country.
(3)J.B. Hirst's article "The Pioneer Legend" noted the wide appeal of the Bush myth as a pioneer legend. It was malleable enough to include a range of pioneer experiences, individualistic and collectivist.
The Bush Myth and the Role of Women
One reappraisal missing from the 1978 set of articles was the observation that
the Bush myth excluded women. This was later taken up by Kay Schaffer Women
and the Bush (
The Small Urban Population of
An argument against the Australian Legend is the statistical information
that
Australian Non-Aboriginal
Population American
Population
•
1858 1
Million
1790 4 million
•
1918 5
Million
1830 13 million
•
1959 10
Million
1860 31 million
•
1982 15
Million
1900 75 million
•
2002 20
Million
1915 100 million
•
1967 200 million
•
2006
300 million
For the
first 40 years 1788- 1828 white settlement was largely confined to small areas
of the Australian continent.
In 1861
•
NSW 41.1
percent urban
•
Qld 40.6 percent
urban
•
In 1976
Urban as
100,000 people of more in 1981:
•
•
•
•
For
comparing
•
http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h980.html
2001
Census:
•
85
percent of Australians lived with 50km or 30 minutes drive of the beach.
•
Only 13
percent of Australians lived in rural areas or small communities. This figure
has been declining steadily:
Declining
Percentage of rural population of Australian States

Urbanisation
in Australia compared to Overseas
|
Country |
Urban/Rural Percentage |
|
|
84.5 Urban to 15.5 Rural (1966) |
|
|
70 Urban to 30 Rural (1966) |
|
|
70.9 Urban to 29.1 Rural (1960) |
|
|
74.3 Urban to 25.7 Rural (1966) |
|
|
79.1 Urban to 20.9 Rural (1969) |
|
|
71.4 Urban to 28.6 Rural (1968) |
|
|
78.9 Urban to 21.4 Rural (1965) |
|
|
67.7 Urban to 32.3 Rural (1965) |
|
|
70.8 Urban to 29.2 Rural (1969) |
|
|
55.3 Urban to 44.7 Rural (1966) |
|
|
5 Urban to 95 Rural (1967) |