RACISM AND NATIONALISM

Australian Nationalism as Racism

The Australian historian Humphrey McQueen contends in his 1970 book, A New Britannia: An Argument Concerning the Social Origins of Australian Radicalism and Nationalism, that 'racism is the most important single component of Australian nationalism'.
 

A Nation as a Single Race

In 1901, when the White Australia Policy was introduced, Australian society was overwhelmingly British, and the desire to remain 'one people without admixture of other races' was one of the powerful forces which impelled the colonies towards federation.
Indeed, it can be argued that 'Australian nationalism was shaped on the anvil of racial antipathy, and that in the colonial mind the idea of nationhood was defined, to a large extent, in racial terms'.
 

Social Darwinism

The rationalisation for Anglo-Saxon racism in the nineteenth century was the application of the Social Darwinist principle that humanity, like biology, was involved in 'the survival of the fittest'.  According to this, the Anglo-Saxon race was at the top of the hierarchy. 'Racial purity' was stressed.
 

Beginnings of the White Australia Policy:

Antagonism Towards Chinese Gold Miners

1843 Anti-coolie petition against proposal to introduce Indians.
1855  In Victoria a poll-tax of £10 and movement restrictions were imposed upon the Chinese. This was the first anti-Chinese law.
1857 Buckland River anti-Chinese riot.
1860 Anti-Chinese riot at Lambing Flat.
1861 More serious riot at Lambing Flat. New South Wales Chinese Immigrants Regulation Law.
1863 Robert Towns initiates large scale importation of Kanakas to Queensland.
1867 Anti-Chinese riots at Crocodile Creek goldfield in Central Queensland.
1873 Riots at Clunies when Chinese used as strike breakers at mines.
1877 Anti-Chinese riots at Palmer River field. Queensland restriction laws.
1878 Seaman's strike in Sydney against use of Chinese crews on ships.
1879 First Intercolonial Trades Union Congress opposed Chinese immigration.
 

Early Colonial Attempts at Building a 'White Australia'

1880 First Intercolonial Conference stated a need for uniform restriction laws.
1881 South Australia enacted laws in accordance with Conference recommendations.
1884 Trade unions against Chinese in furniture trade.
1885 Queensland laws regulate importation of Kanakas.
1886 Western Australia restricted Chinese immigration. The nationalists magazine, The Bulletin began agitation against Chinese.
1887 Chinese Commission said the restriction laws breached the Anglo-Chinese treaty.
1888 Chinese prevented from disembarking at Sydney and Melbourne.
1888 New South Wales re-introduced anti-Chinese legislation.
1888 Term 'White Australia Policy' appeared in William Lane's workingman's magazine, Boomerang.
 
 

Federation and the Official Start of White Australia Policy

1894 Anglo-Japanese Treaty of Commerce and Navigation signed.
1896 Intercolonial Conference wants to extend restrictions to all non-Europeans.
1897 Western Australia introduced a dictation test on the 1897 Natal model.
1900 Federation, Commonwealth given power to legislate on immigration.
1901 Immigration Restriction Act 1901 and the Pacific Islands Labourers Act 1901.

Origins of Racism Behind the White Australia Policy

Influence of Social Darwinism is evident in the speeches of the Australian founding fathers who created the White Australia Policy in 1901.

The imagery of the time, ie cartoons, conveys a racial impression and this carries on throughout much of the twentieth century.

The Impetus for Federation: To Form an Australian Nation
These quotes can be found in the course notes in the library called "Commonwealth Parliamentary Debates 1901"
Alfred Deakin, Deputy PM, 12 September 1901 in the Commonwealth Parliament:
"No motive operated more powerfully in dissolving the technical and arbitrary political divisions which previously separated us than the desire that we should be one people and remain one people without the admixture of other races."

Alfred Deakin, Deputy PM, 12 September 1901:
"The unity of Australia is nothing, if that does not imply a united race. Unity of race is an absolute essential to the unity of Australia."

The Intellectuals Roots of the White Australia Policy:
Social Darwinism in The Australian Parliament

Prime Minister Edmund Barton in his speeches on the debates on the Immigration Restriction Bill cited the work of Social Darwinist intellectual Charles Pearson's work. Pearson's National Life and Character described the world struggle of the white black and yellow races for supremacy:

PM Edmund Barton quotes Pearson's view of world racial struggle in Parliament, 7 August 1901:
"We are struggling among ourselves for supremacy in a world which we thought of as destined to belong to the Aryan races and to the Christian faith...We shall wake to find ourselves elbowed and hustled, and perhaps even thrust aside by peoples whom we looked down upon as servile, and thought of as bound always to minister of our needs."

Selected quotations on nation and race from Paul Kelly's video series 100 Years: The Story of Australia (ABC, 2001) episode The Rise and Fall of Australia:

From the 1901 debate on the Immigration Restriction Bill which established the White Australia Policy:
Prime Minister Edmund Barton: "The doctrine of the equality of man was never meant to apply to the equality of the Englishman and the Chinaman."

Alfred Deakin: "Unity of race is an absolute essential to the unity of Australia."

William Morris Hughes (Labor Party): "Our chief plank is a White Australia. There is no compromise about that. The industrious coloured brother has to go and remain away."

Bulletin, 2 July 1887: "All men who come to these shores with a clean record who leave behind a memory of class distinctions and religious differences of  the old world are Australians. No nigger, no Chinaman, no laska, no Kanaka, no purveyor of cheap coloured labour is an Australian".

7 August 1901 Barton rose to speak in the Commonwealth Australian Parliament to speak on the Immigration Restriction Bill:
"I need make no apology for calling this one of the most important matters with regard to the future of Australia."

Deakin made the most powerful case for a White Australia:
"The unity of Australia is nothing if that does not imply a united race. A united race not only means that its members can intermix, intermarry, and associate without degradation on either side, but implies one inspired by the same ideas."

James Watson (Labor Party):
"The objection I have to the intermixing of these coloured people with the white people of Australia, I admit is to a large extent tinged considerations of a industrial nature, lies in the main the possibility and probability of racial contamination."

Prime Minister Edmund Barton: "I do not think that the doctrine of the equality of man was really ever intended to include racial equality. There is no racial equality. There is that basic inequality. These races are, in comparison with white races, unequal and inferior."

Supporting the White Australia Policy was Jewish MP Isaac Isaacs, who would later become Chief Justice and the first Australian Governor-General: "I am prepared to do all that is necessary to ensure that Australia shall be free for all time from contamination of the degrading influences of inferior races."

Origins of Racism Behind the White Australia Policy

Influence of Social Darwinism is evident in the speeches of the Australian founding fathers who created the White Australia Policy in 1901. The imagery of the time, ie cartoons, conveys a racial impression and this carries on throughout much of the twentieth century.

The Impetus for Federation: To Form an Australian Nation

Deakin, Deputy PM, 12 September 1901:

“…no motive operated more powerfully in dissolving the technical and arbitrary political divisions which previously separated us than the desire that we should be one people and remain one people without the admixture of other races”.

“The unity of Australia is nothing, if that does not imply a united race…Unity of race is an absolute essential to the unity of Australia.”

Later in the debate he referred to Japan in particular “…It is not the bad qualities but the good qualities of these alien races that make them dangerous to us. It is their inexhaustible energy, their power of applying themselves to new tasks, their endurance… They are separated from us by a gulf which we cannot bridge to the advantage of either.”

The Intellectuals Roots of the White Australia Policy

Prime Minister Barton in his speeches on the debates on the Immigration Restriction Bill cited the work of Social Darwinist intellectual Charles Pearson’s work. Pearson’s National Life and Character described the world struggle of the white black and yellow races for supremacy.

Social Darwinism in the Australian Parliament:

PM Barton quotes Pearson’s view of world racial struggle in Parliament, 7 August 1901:

 “We are struggling among ourselves for supremacy in a world which we thought of as destined to belong to the Aryan races and to the Christian faith… We shall wake to find ourselves elbowed and hustled, and perhaps even thrust aside by peoples whom we looked down upon as servile, and thought of as bound always to minister of our needs.”

Perhaps The Influence of Social Darwinism Persists:

The Nazis also embraced a racial ideology based upon Social Darwinism. Historian David Day wrote in 1997:

‘Whereas the Nazis decreed that “no Jew can be a member of the German Race”, Hanson and her ilk have implicitly asserted that “no Asian can be a real Australian”’.
 
Was there ever a time when there was no racism?

Some historians, such as Arnold Toynbee, and Ivan Hannaford, have argued that racism was absent before modern times because the world was simply divided between Christian and heathen.

Other historians point to the colonisation of America by the Spanish as indications that racism was deep rooted in Western culture

Finding Racism absent in the Images of the Middle Ages and Reformation

There existed the theme in paintings of the Black Magus, depicting one of the three Magi (wise men) at the birth of Jesus as black - Black Magus in The Adoration Hans Baldung Grien 1517.

There is the depiction of black saints in artistic work - The Meeting of Saint Erasmus and Saint Mauritius by Mathias Grunewald, 1517

Black figures were shown in position of equality with Europeans in art works - Central Panel of the Triptych, The Garden of Delight by Hieronymus Bosch c.1500

Saint Mauritius and the Depiction of Race

Saint Mauritius, the head of the Theban legion of Christians in Egypt suffered martyrdom near Cologne in AD 302.

He became patron saint of Burgundy and also one of the patrons of the Holy Roman Empire.

In German art, he was occasionally depicted as black.

Was there an Idea of Racial Inequality in the early conquest of the Americas?

The Evolution of Racism

Ivan Hannaford traces the evolution of the idea of race in Race: the History of an Idea in the West (1997).

It appears that the brutal conquistadors of the Americas had no concept of racial superiority, only Christian and “heathen”.

Only in the late eighteenth century, was the concept of race first used according to its modern meaning to distinguish people of different nations.

Absence of Racism until the late Eighteenth Century

Even the eighteenth century’s idea of the ‘noble savage’ did not dismiss so-called primitive peoples as innately inferior.

The concept of the ‘noble savage’ entailed that ‘civilised’ man and the healthy ‘savage’ in the ‘Garden of Eden’ or Pacific paradise were generally the same except for having different environments.

The Absence of Racism in European Thinking before the late Eighteenth Century?

Unity and equality in faith were upheld by Christianity.

Most writers upheld the equality of the North American Indian in legal terms.

However in practice there was enslavement of the North American Indian.

After the mid-nineteenth century, the concept of Race developed into one of the major ways humanity was divided up.

Perhaps the idea of Race fully developed in the mid-nineteenth century and modern imperialism?